Friday, 31 July 2009

Liberty Lives In Montana

Finally the states are fighting back against the Federal Government.

The American Revolution was based on the principle of States Rights.

Finally the States are resisting the 'death of a thousand cuts' attack on democracy that the Federal Government wants to impose upon the people.

Obama is a 'Big State Socialist' Fabian puppet, as opposed to the 'Corporate State Capitalism' Fabianism of Bush - but both are Fabians who see the State as primarily a mechanism to serve the interests of big business and the corporations including the oil companies, the military industrial block and the bankers.

From the May 2009 Idaho Observer:

Montana governor signs "revolutionary" gun law

By The Idaho Observer

At a time when the most disarming "gun grab" bills in U.S. history are being debated in Congress, the state of Montana passed what could be described as the "lock and load law." The move is seen by many as the most overt challenge to relentlessly advancing federal authority since South Carolina seceded from the union in 1861.

Citing the compact between the U.S. government and Montana upon entering the union as the foundation describing the relationship between the two and applicable constitutional provisions and amendments, the Montana legislature passed HB 246 and it was signed by Governor Brian Schweitzer April 15, 2009.

The thrust of the law is to restore the right for lawful Montanans to keep and bear arms yet not invite federal intervention by being in violation of the "clause of all our problems"—the commerce clause, wherein the federal government finds the authority to regulate interstate commerce.

Ernest Hancock of the news portal Freedom’s Phoenix highlighted the new law’s most important Points: "If guns and ammunition are manufactured inside the state of Montana for sale and use inside Montana then the federal firearms laws have no applicability since the federal government only has the power to control commerce across state lines.

"Silencers made in Montana and sold in Montana would be fully legal and not registered. As a note, silencers were first used before the 007 movies as a device to enable one to hunt without disturbing neighbors and scaring game. They were also useful as devices to control noise when practicing so as to not disturb the neighbors."

Quoting the law: A personal firearm, a firearm accessory, or ammunition that is manufactured commercially or privately in Montana and that remains within the borders of Montana is not subject to federal law or federal regulation, including registration, under the authority of congress to regulate interstate commerce. It is declared by the legislature that those items have not traveled in interstate commerce. This section applies to a firearm, a firearm accessory, or ammunition that is manufactured in Montana from basic materials and that can be manufactured without the inclusion of any significant parts imported from another state. Generic and insignificant parts that have other manufacturing or consumer product applications are not firearms, firearms accessories, or ammunition, and their importation into Montana and incorporation into a firearm, a firearm accessory, or ammunition manufactured in Montana does not subject the firearm, firearm accessory, or ammunition to federal regulation. It is declared by the legislature that basic materials, such as unmachined steel and unshaped wood, are not firearms, firearms accessories, or ammunition and are not subject to congressional authority to regulate firearms, firearms accessories, and ammunition under interstate commerce as if they were actually firearms, firearms accessories, or ammunition."

The only exceptions are firearms, "that cannot be carried and used by one person or have "...a bore diameter greater than 1 1/2 inches and that uses smokeless powder, not black powder, as a propellant."

Explosive ammo and fully automatic firearms are also not covered under the law which will be applied to all qualifying firearms, accessories and ammunition stamped "Made in Montana" after Oct. 1, 2009.

Montana has just given itself the green light to arm itself as the Democrat-controlled Congress is seeking to ban all the firearms, accessories and ammunition that will be lawful and unregistered in the Big Sky state. Gun grabbers in Congress are also attempting to ban huge demographics of people from being able to obtain licenses to own guns.

Add to Technorati Favorites

Gary McKinnon and the US Shadow Government

There is a secret.

It is classified at the highest level of US security classifications, above even that of the atomic bomb during the era of the Cold War.

For something that is not meant to exist, the fact the secret was classified higher than even the atomic bomb should make people wonder why a 'joke' was taken so seriously by the military and US government.

If the secret wasnt real, then why try so hard to hide it ?

The entire US military was re-organised in 1947 under the National Security Act so as to ensure this secret was not revealed to the world.

Eisenhower warned the world of the growing power of the military-industrial block, and the trillions of dollars that have poured into the US black budgets since 1947 have created an alternative shadow government.

That government is accountable to no president nor to the people.

Gary McKinnon almost cracked the shield of steel around the secret that the Shadow Government was set up to keep secret.

McKinnon revealed two important facts ;

1)NASA is storing hidden files that contain images of extra-terrestrial space craft

2) That NASA also has an off earth space fleet

The question is therefore - this level of technology is decades above what the world currently has. The energy systems of such craft could solve the worlds energy problems.

Where did it come from ?

The information that McKinnon discovered did not reveal whether those craft were alien space craft or re-engineered alien technology or advanced human designed and built craft. It may be that the technology he saw, and the UFO's we see in our sky, are advanced human designed and built air craft using energy systems unlike anything currently in use.

If the US has these energy propulsion systems then this means the global energy crisis is solved, and that the US is hiding this technology from the rest of the world in order to keep its technical and military superiority.

This means the US is the enemy of the whole planet, as this level of technology couild save humanity and the planet from the looming energy crisis.

If McKinnon is right and what he saw on the files he downloaded were alien craft then it means the greatest secret in human history is being hidden by the US military for their own military advantage and to keep the present political and economic elites in a power - as the history of humanity is based on energy.

Who controls the energy supply of the world, controls the world.

If the technology is alien then we have a right to know - if the technology is human then we demand the US shares it with the rest of the world and we end the reliance on fossil fuels, end the oil wars like Iraq and build a better world based on human being taking care of their own populations numbers and using the planet in a sustainable manner.

McKinnon is being extradited as a signal to others who may also want to reveal the secrets they know about the secret.

There are those, little people with little minds, that mock the great men and women who have witnessed advanced craft that are beyond anything that man is capable of building.

Some of their testimony, from astronauts to ex-presidents, can be seen here ;

Gary McKinnon is a sacrificial lamb, in that his prosecution and imprisonment will be used to terrify others into never again attempting to unlock the secret.

Add to Technorati Favorites

Thursday, 30 July 2009

The Bowman

The Bowman.

Hold fast to the past, the old man said,
His fingers frail as seaweed fronds,
Fluttered upon the sheets as black ribbons,
In the slow, soft sob of an ebbing tide.

He had witnessed in the wilderness, unspeakable deeds,
The sins of a century which darkened his soul,
Each evil sat upon its dais, as a devil upon a grave,
Whilst the restless future fared forth, seeking new riders.

This famished flotsam had once nocked a bow,
And fingered free arrows of war, sleek killers,
Which whispered vicious as they sought the boss,
Casting fire and fury upon nations, presidents and kings.

For this shell had fought the monsters,
Who issued the orders that others obeyed,
Yet the years have left only a hollow husk,
And nothing remains of the man inside.

Blinded now, only the shadows of his loss linger on,
As a familiar scratch in his flare scorched eyes,
Where hung upon the wires, are torn and tattered flags,
Each wilting as a flower, symbolic of our betrayal.

Lady Paramount will bestow her blessings,
History as she is known, for she has the last word,
The quiver is as empty as an open grave,
And only the point is left behind, that war is hell.

Add to Technorati Favorites

Becoming A Devil

One of the great hidden stories of the American Liberal Society is that of the racist rapes that go on in prison where vulnerable white male prisoners are raped by black gangs.

Whilst liberals seek a million excuses to excuse black racism against whites, Islamic extremism or Zionist Fascism - the reality of the rapes in prison that radicalise and racialise young whites is ignored and minimised.

It appears that whilst the merest form of racism such as a ' black look ' is enough to justify the title of a 'racist event' and cause 'emotional suffering' that justifies the anger of black society actualising in such events as riots, it appears that being the victim of male rape means nothing when the victim is white.

It appears that whilst America seeks to deny both the overwhelming black on white rape epidemic where black males rape white women outside prisons, at the same time it hides the reality of the vast numbers of rapes that black males commit in prisons.

Just because the rapist is in prison, doesnt mean the rapes stop.

All that happens is the black rapist transfers his evil onto an alternate sex - but the rapes are always black on white racist rapes, as the race of the victim always remains the same.

BECOMING A DEVIL by Joseph Sobran

WASHINGTON -- John William King has been sentenced to death for the cruel murder of James Byrd Jr., a black man whom King and his friends dragged behind their truck until his body was torn to pieces. Most murders are cruel, but in this case the cruelty was the whole point.

Far from repenting, King, a white supremacist, still gloats over his act. After his death sentence was handed down, he addressed an obscenity to Byrd's family. Such vicious hatred is almost unfathomable.

The entire town of Jasper, Texas, is ashamed of the crime. King's family is mortified and apologetic. But like many diabolical acts, this one has summoned grace: It has united the town in the desire for justice for the victim and mercy toward King's family.

But a perverse moral has been drawn. Liberal pundits are citing this bizarre murder as evidence of persistent white racism in America. King is being turned into a symbol of general white guilt.

The truth is more specific. A clue to the real explanation lies in King's personal history.

King served a two-year prison sentence for burglary, which suggests a predisposition to violate other people's rights. While in prison, he joined a white supremacist group and covered his body with Nazi and Klan tattoos. One psychiatrist at his trial suggested that this may have been a way to deter attacks by black inmates. Time magazine quotes another witness as saying King became part of a group known as "peckerwoods," described as "whites who would not yield money or sexual favors to blacks."

Just a few details mentioned in passing. But they are worth dwelling on. White convicts complain, unavailingly, of a particularly ugly fact of life in prisons: racial attacks on whites by non-whites. Assault, robbery and homosexual rape are commonplace. The fact that there was a special slang term among inmates in King's prison for "whites who would not yield money or sexual favors to blacks" is grim evidence of this condition. Apparently there was no need for a term for blacks who wouldn't yield money or sexual favors to whites.

There could hardly be a better recipe for racial hatred. Young whites like King, a minority in prison, are thrown to the wolves, and they know they can expect no protection or sympathy from prison officials, liberal opinion or society in general when they are bullied and raped. The fear and humiliation they suffer is almost unimaginable, and it goes unreported.

In such snake pits, their only safety may lie in joining racial gangs. It should be no surprise when they emerge from prison not only hating blacks, but despising all conventional standards of morality.

This doesn't excuse them when they commit crimes like King's. No "root cause" can relieve them of responsibility for their acts. But it does explain their race-hatred as something other than the residual racial prejudice of the larger society. That hatred is the natural result of the specific experience they are subjected to.

Few men want to talk about having been raped. It has the same horror for them as for women, with the added disgrace of feeling one's manhood annihilated in a setting where one can least afford to lose it. To be raped in prison is to become a target for frequent rape. When the rapes also have a racial motive, the victim can be expected to respond by going to irrational extremes -- murder, suicide or generalized hatred against the whole race he feels violated by. In a twisted way, he may try to reclaim his lost dignity by adopting racial supremacism, posing as racial victor instead of racial victim.

So King may have come out of prison with a lot more race-hatred than he took in with him. James Byrd did nothing to deserve to be the one to pay for it. But neither do other whites deserve to be blamed for his fate.

If society in general can be blamed for anything, it's for making a prison sentence a sentence to hell, where becoming a devil may be a survival strategy -- for men of any race.

Add to Technorati Favorites

Becoming A Devil - Another race story the media hide

The ADL Applauds Senate's Passage of Hate Crime Legislation. The Bill which is known as the The Matthew Shepard Hate Crimes Prevention Act, passed the Senate 63-28, and is supported by the President who will sign it into law. Organizations such as the ADL have aggressively promoted hate crime legislation. These organizations have endorsed Europe and Canada's policies on prosecuting what they deem as hate speech. The ADL openly advocates for their model anti-hate law which has been adopted by many states.

The bill is unconstitutional because it violates the 10th Amendment by granting the Federal Government authority over local and state government in prosecuting hate crimes. It violates the 14th Amendment by granting certain groups special protected status, as well the double jeopardy clause of the 5th amendment.

Recently the Plains State ADL Director denounced the 1st Amendment by saying that "freedom of speech does not extend to racist groups, nor give their supporters the right to threaten and intimidate others or commit acts of violence."In many western nations, an individual can be prosecuted by the government for certain speech. In 1988 the ADL gave out an award to law student Joseph Ribikoff for writing a proposed hate crime bill that would criminalize hate speech against gays and minorities.

In testimony before the Senate Judiciary Committee, ADL Washington counsel Michael Lieberman spoke in support of the Hate Crimes Bill. "We have no illusions about this legislation," Lieberman testified. "We know that bigotry, racism, homophobia, and anti-Semitism cannot be legislated out of existence. A new federal law that finally addresses all victims of hate crimes will not eliminate them."

Let us take a look at how the ADL has handled two major hate crimes. They exploited the racial Murder of James Byrd using the tragedy to call for stiffer hate crime laws and a tougher stance against white racism. However they take a very differant stand when whites are the victims of hate crimes.

Not to excuse his crimes but it is important to note that John King, the white supremacist who was responsible for the murder of James Byrd became a hardened racist due to his his experience being gang raped by black gang members while incarcerated in a notorious Texas Prison for a petty crime. He latter joined a white gang for protection [See Becoming A Devil, by Joseph Sobran].

That part of King's story was completely ignored by the media because it would change the perception of him as from an evil white supremacist to a man who was driven insane and full of hatred by being a victim of a horrific crime just because he was white. When Michael Jackson was accused of child molestation it was brought to attention that he was abused as a child and that gained him sympathy by some segments of the society while hardly anyone had any sympathy for King.

In regards to the horrific black and white crime known as the Knoxville murders the ADL took and very differant position. Quoting an article by James H. Lilley, also stated in other blogs, etc:

On Saturday January 6, 2007 Hugh Christopher Newsom, age 23 and Channon Gail Christian, age 21, both students at the University of Tennessee went out on a date. They were driving in Channon's Toyota 4-Runner when they were carjacked at gunpoint. Suddenly the crime turned far more savage than an armed car theft. Chris and Channon were kidnapped and driven to 2316 Chipman Street where they were forced into the home at gunpoint. While Channon was forced to watch, her boyfriend was raped prison style and then his penis was cut off. He was later driven to nearby railroad tracks where he was shot and set afire. But Channon's hell was just beginning. She was beaten; gang raped repeatedly in many ways, had one of her breasts cut off and bleach poured down her throat to destroy DNA evidence-all while she was still alive. To add to Channon's degradation the suspects took turns urinating on her. They too set her body afire, apparently inside the residence, but for some reason left her body there-in five separate trash bags...

The mainstream media including most mainstream conservatives with the exception of Michelle Malkin, Walter Williams, and Michael Savage refused to cover the story because they knew it would instill anger on behalf of whites. Compare that to the coverage the Duke Lacrosse gang rape of a black stripper by white Lacrosse players that ended up being a Hoax.

The ADL Condemns White Supremacist Attempts to Exploit Knoxville murders. Yet they have gone out of their way to politically exploit any crime commited by white supremacist such as the recent Holocaust Museum shooting as well as the murders of James Byrd and Matthew Sheppard, whom the hate bill is named after. The ADL also defended the horrific atrocities of Israel's Operation in Gaza. Regardless of their race all victims of horrific crimes deserve justice. The ADL has not only failed to live up to it mission "to secure justice and fair treatment to all," but has gone out of it's to support injustice whether for Chris Newsom and Channon Christian or for the people of Gaza.

Add to Technorati Favorites

And so it begins - The Greatest Crash

The Great Crash begins in September 2009.

Much of the billions of bail out dollars issued by the Federal Reserve has been spent on propping up the dollar in foreign capital markets (by the money being loaned to foreign banks to buy US dollars ) and in simply covering future bad debts related to mortgages and collapsing consumer and business loan repayments.

The money has not been used to assist those with mortgage problems or to increase capital flow to business, primarily it has been used in ways that ensure the dollar remains a functional currency in the international markets and to minimise the US domestic inflation rates, regardless of how many businesses go broke and workers are thrown out of work.

Therefore as a result the Great Crash is about to hit when the dollar collapses on the international markets and a new run on the US banks begins when foreign nations stop buying the dollar and this causes a dollar devaluation that ruins both their existing capital asset base and any chance of dealing with future debt assets.

Hear how the process is being discovered here ;

Add to Technorati Favorites

Monday, 27 July 2009

Isis and Bootes - As Above, So Below

Images - the star constellation of Bootes and the Ankh symbol, related to the goddess Isis (the mother of Horus) who was the first daughter of Geb, god of the Earth, and Nut, the goddess of the Overarching Sky. At some time Isis absorbed some characteristics of Hathor a powerful deity.

The Ankh is a symbol of the star constellation Bootes, the guardian constellation of Egypt that protected Egypt from the forces of chaos in the North as represented by the Great Bear constellation, Meshkitu.

I have been doing some research into a new hobby of mine which is an analysis of the cosmology and theology of Ancient Egypt.

I have made some interesting discoveries which I think some people may be interested in.

The origin of the symbol that is called the Ankh is a matter of great debate amongst egyptologists.

I think I have cracked the answer.

The Ankh is a symbol representing the star constellation Bootes.

It represents the celestial talisman that protects Egypt from the forces of chaos and death in the North represented by the star constellation Ursa Major, the Great Bear, known as Meshkitu.

This is reinforced with its assocation with Isis. Isis is the daughter of the sky goddess Nut and earth god Geb. Therefore we can see that this refers to Isis being represented in the stars. Isis is also associated with Hathor, the goddess of the Milky Way, and therefore we see another association with her being associated with night, space, the milky way and stars.

I have managed to unlock most of the ancient Egyptian cosomology and it is amazing the scientific knowledge on the stars the ancient Egyptians possessed.

Add to Technorati Favorites

More on Government / Nazis False Flag Operations

Yet more evidence that the 'nazis' that post on online forums are working for the system.

First we saw that the Human Rights Commission in Canada were posting comments on stormfront in order to incite racism and hence justify their existence and massive budgets.

Then we saw the Canadian Jewish Congress sending undercover agents into neo-nazi groups in order to ensure that such groups existed and acted as the justification for the existence of the Jewish Congress and its continual scrounging of money from the government, private donors and to keep the Zionist elite in power.

Now we see that the Office of Homeland Security is also posting on forums in the US and inciting racism - and do we honestly think that they arent also posting on Islamist sites and Stormfront as well !

It is obvious that the government and its agents are inciting racial tensions in nations deliberately via allowing mass immigration and then putting racist comments on the internet in order to incite people into acts of racism in order to justify the expansion of the security and surveillance state and to allow them to target patriots, nationalists, constitutionalists and anyone else that dares defy their plans for the New World Order.

Racist Web Posts Traced to Homeland Security

Published: July 24, 2009

After federal border agents detained several Mexican immigrants in western New York in June, an article about the incident in a local newspaper drew an onslaught of vitriolic postings on its Web site. Some were racist. Others attacked farmers in the region, an apple-growing area east of Rochester, accusing them of harboring illegal workers. Still others made personal attacks about the reporter who wrote the article.

Most of the posts were made anonymously. But in reviewing the logs of its Internet server, the paper, The Wayne County Star in Wolcott, traced three of them to Internet protocol addresses at the Department of Homeland Security, which oversees border protection.

Homeland Security started an investigation into the posts this month, according to the reporter, Louise Hoffman-Broach, and Richard M. Healy, the Wayne County district attorney. A spokeswoman for the federal agency’s inspector general said she could neither confirm nor deny an investigation; department rules prohibit the use of office equipment for the personal transmission of material that could offend fellow employees or the public.

Coming on the eve of the apple harvest season, the Web posts and the investigation — first reported this week on The Star’s Web site — have ratcheted up longstanding tensions in Wayne County, where farmers and laborers have accused immigration officials of using heavy-handed tactics like racial profiling and arbitrary or unjustified detentions.

Such tactics, the farmers say, have scared Hispanic farmworkers from the region just as growers are preparing for the harvest.

Representative Dan Maffei, who represents the area in Congress, said the allegations of overaggressive immigration enforcement, coming from a wide range of constituents, were “of extreme concern.”

“I’m investigating these reports to make sure that people’s rights aren’t being harmed and that the economy of Wayne County is not being harmed,” said Mr. Maffei, a Democrat.

A. J. Price, a regional spokesman for United States Customs and Border Protection, defended the work of the area’s officers. “We are constantly criticized for doing our job, and that’s just part of our job,” Mr. Price said.

Local officials and residents say that beginning about 2006, federal officials stepped up their enforcement of immigration laws in western New York.

Farmers and other residents said the push created a climate of fear in communities whose economies depend on migrant laborers, many of them illegal immigrants.

The Obama administration has moved to a less confrontational policy at work sites, focusing on employers. But Customs and Border Protection, which does not conduct work-site inspections, had not changed its strategy in New York, Mr. Price said.

The latest flare-up began with a boat trip on June 12. A local farmer, Robert Norris, decided to take a Mexican employee and relatives of another worker for a spin on Lake Ontario, Ms. Hoffman-Broach said.

Federal agents stopped the boat because it had too many people on board, Mr. Price said. When some of the passengers were unable to produce documentation proving they were citizens or legal immigrants, he said, they were detained. All but one was eventually released, The Star reported.

The article about the arrests, posted on June 16, led to a torrent of angry Web postings. One, sent from a fake e-mail address, said, “watcha doing to mi wifey, no checky her papeles. she no legal, but she havey benifit card.”

A response, which carried a Homeland Security Internet protocol address, read: “That sounds like my boyfriend. Leave him alones and get your own. My boyfriend works sometimes but he is really good at getting FREE benefits from the Federal and State government.”

Another post, apparently sent from a separate computer linked to Homeland Security, read in part: “These farmers have a problem because the gravy train that they were riding for soooooo long is being brought to light.”

The newspaper removed the posts. It also reported that it had discovered others, dating to last year, that appeared to have come from computers affiliated with Homeland Security

Add to Technorati Favorites

Sunday, 26 July 2009

The Last Tommy

Image - The 92nd Highlanders at the Battle of Kandahar, 1st September 1880

In memory of Harry Patch.

The Last Tommy.

The last Tommy left on earth,
Lived long enough to see,
A return to Empire, Great Britain at war,
Dust on the boots of broken troops,
Dragging their rusty rifles behind them,
On patrol in the ruins of Babylon.

The last Tommy watched live on TV,
As Blair and Bush unsheathed their swords,
And Parliament a toothless poodle, whimpered,
Then voted for war, rapine, murder and havoc,
The war for oil the oligarchs demanded,
The seed of 911, as a serpent unravelling.

The last Tommy saw Islam’s rise, a new Great Game,
Infidels dug deep into deserts sands,
Sheltering from the fire of farmers and shepherds,
Inching their way warily through poppy fields,
In bloom beneath the misty mountains,
Where Alexander, Elphinstone and Ustinov bled.

The last Tommy always remembered,
His brothers slaughtered in the mire,
Of Passchendaele, the groaning martyrs grave,
Where a generation found its Golgotha,
Boys waiting in trenches for battles to begin,
Each shard of shrapnel, a Roman spear.

The last Tommy always thought,
That wars were organised murder,
And that simple men like him,
From small towns and country hamlets,
Were fed to the machines, led abroad to their death,
A fact well grounded in his witness.

Add to Technorati Favorites

Obama WILL be Impeached

The result of the court case below means that Obama and his legal team have virtually surrendered - all they can do is rely on the judges blocking the cases, but the judges cannot do that forever.

More and more people will be issuing writs refusing presidential orders - until the point that Obama either throws in the towel or impeachment begins.

Obama has become the most succesful con man in history, a con man whose entire political life was based on lies.

His most succesful lie was where he was born - he used it to claim Natural Born Citizenship and a right to stand for president, when he was in the exact same position as Arnold Schwarzeneger in that Arnie caanot stand for President as he is a Citizen of the US but not a Natural Born Citizen.

Therefore both Obama and Arnie are unable to be presidents of the US under the terms of the US constitution.

The failure to prove that the president occupies his position lawfully as in this case shows us that, just as in the case of the law to allow income tax for workers, there is no law.

This is just another example of tyranny.

Add to the issue the fact that Obama and his legal team allowed fake documents to be printed and circulated to act as his birth certificate, then this shows that not only is the president illegal but he is probably being blackmalied by those who printed and supplied the fake birth certificates.

Therefore America is in the worst of all positions - it has a usurper as a president who is controlled by the criminals and blackmailers who got him into power.

America is now Zimbabwe.

The only thing that will stop Obama being impeached if is the US is declared by him as to be in a state of emergency and all civil laws suspended, such as a court case to get him out.

Therefore expect as these writs get closer to revealing the lies that got him elected, then expect the most destructive terrorist act in American history on US soil to happen, a war against Iran that quickly escelates into a massive Middle East conflict or some other 'false flag' operation related to terrorism to begin to impact upon the US which will allow the government to declare martial law.

WAR IS OVER! If you want it

by Rod Ciferri
That’s right; the war is over due to the courageous act of one Major Stefan Frederick Cook, United States Army Reserve, who recently challenged an Army order to deploy to Afghanistan on the grounds that they could not lawfully order him to deploy.

Since the Army has only that authority given to it by the President, and, since Obama himself must possess the authority of President in order to delegate it to the Army, Major Cook believes Obama must prove he has such authority before he may lawfully comply with an Army order to deploy.

Now, you may have heard of the controversy surrounding de facto President Obama’s eligibility to run for President. It has been the basis for over a dozen lawsuits, all of which have been dismissed, mostly because the courts have found the suits to concern “political questions”, the usual cop-out they use when they have a case that poses a constitutional controversy they’d rather not deal with. Perhaps you have just dismissed the claims that Obama is not a “natural born citizen” outright since the various lawsuits have not made it to first base.

Due to the actions of Cook, however, it’s becoming obvious that Obama is hiding something.

What he is hiding may contain the key that unlocks the door to peace for as long “President” Obama remains in “office”. After Cook commenced his lawsuit, the U.S. Army revoked their order to deploy him. Moreover, as of this date, Cook has not been discharged from the Army.

Why has the U.S. Army revoked his order to deploy? Why have they not just commenced court martial proceedings to send him to Leavenworth, as is their habit when a soldier refuses deployment? The answer is the lawsuit.

The lawsuit would open up a can of worms in civilian court that would require looking into Obama’s eligibility for the office of U.S. President in order to resolve it.

Major Cook filed the suit with the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Georgia. In the suit, he sought an injunction to stay the deployment order and declatory judgment stating he has conscientious objector status based on his belief that Obama is not a “natural born” citizen and is therefore ineligible to serve as president, such declatory judgment to be effective until such time that Obama’s eligibility is proven by clear and convincing evidence.

After the revocation of the order to deploy, Judge Clay Land sided with the defense, finding Cook’s suit “moot” in that he already has been told he doesn’t have to go to Afghanistan, eliminating his need for relief from the court. ”Federal court only has authority of actual cases and controversies,” Judge Land said according to the Miami Herald. “The entire action is dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.”

Therefore, the U.S. government has signaled it would rather not take up the issue since their boss would have to finally come clean and present clear and convincing evidence of his status of “natural born citizen”. However, the actions of the U.S. government make it seem that he likely wasn’t, and they are willing to give an “out” to any soldier who follows the footsteps of Major Cook in order to not have to deal with such a troublesome fact.

Cook’s attorney, Orly Taitz, argues Obama not only must have been born in this country to be a natural born citizen, in addition, his father must also have been a citizen at the time of Obama’s birth, not owing allegiance to any foreign state. However, it appears that his father, Barack Hussein Obama, Sr., was, at the time of Obama’s birth, a Subject of the British Commonwealth via the then British colony, Kenya, having been born there. Therefore, Obama is ineligible for the office of President.

The key to the legal analysis is that the legal term of art, “natural born citizen”, could only have been defined by the Law of Nations, relied upon by the creators of the constitution in their intended meaning when they used the term in the eligibility requirements of article II, section 1 of the constitution, and which defined it as stated above. It could only have such definition since, at the time of the creators of the constitution, the term “natural born citizen” was only defined in the “Law of Nations”, by the French jurist, Vattel, in 1758, at chapter XIX, sec. 212.

Since there exists no amendment to the constitution that has altered the meaning of the term “natural born citizen”, or the requirement that a candidate for the office of President be one, Barack Obama was never eligible to hold such office.

According to Taitz, if a legitimate long form certificate of live birth was released by Obama it would lay to rest doubt about whether he was born in the United States, but, it may still kill his eligibility for the office of President, since it would also show that his father was not a citizen.

In the meantime, Obama’s status as a natural born citizen remains unclear. However, all the soldiers out there who thought they were in a “catch 22″ and didn’t think there was a way to not fight an immoral and illegal war, here’s your chance to opt out legally, and maybe actually still get paid. Hey, its got to be better scrubbing toilets all day then killing people to support Obama’s corporate bosses.

So, for any soldier who has the guts to do it, following Major Cook’s example may end the war for them. War will never end until the soldiers refuse to fire their weapons. Up until now, that has meant possible imprisonment and loss of a paycheck.

Major Cook’s heroic effort has changed that and simultaneously opened up the possibility of world peace, that’s likely to be regarded in history as even more instrumental to ending the Iraq/Afghanistan war than the tet offensive was to ending the Vietnam war.

For those who want to learn more about the Obama eligibility controversy, a good place to start is World Net Daily and the website of Major Cook’s lawyer, Orly Taitz.

Rod Ciferri is an American who has no politics.

Add to Technorati Favorites

Saturday, 25 July 2009

The Liberty Dollar

Another great video that unmasks the true face of the tyranny we live under is the film From Freedom To Fascism by Aaron Russo.

Video can be seen at above link.

The facts about the Federal Reserve Bank issuing counterfeit currency means that any debt owed by the government to the FRB is void as unlawful in contract law - both the dollars issued by the FBR are fake but also the debt is unlawful.

You can only legally pay for what legally exists - in other words the fact that the US government buys dollars from the FRB means, that as that currency has no true value, then the contract is void as unlawful.

At the same time the basis of income tax on labour is unlawful.

Therefore in one go, by scrapping the FRB and banning income tax paid to the Federal Government for work as opposed to corporate profits, and removing the tax exempt legal status of corporations either via write offs or creative accounting, means the individual is freed almost immediately from any debt.

If corporations were the main tax payers instead of individuals being the primary tax payers, at the same time as a new National Bank of America to replace the FRB were put in place to allow the American Republic ( a constitutional government )to be born then this would mean a Constitutional Revolution had begun.

A new dawn of liberty would arise over America.

No more the chains of slavery to usury upon our limbs and the limbs of our children.

No more the burden of national debt heaped upon the shoulders of future generations whose bright young lives are blighted by decisions taken decades before by corrupt bankers and politicians.

No more the Global Corporate Fascist dictatorship of the New World Order and their cabals of capitalists, bankers, industrialists, oil companies, media bosses and bought and paid for politicians.

No more slavery to the media.

No more terror from the para-military police force of the New World Order, the IRS.

The solution is simple ;

1) Abolish the Federal Reserve Bank and set up the ' National Bank Of America ' which has the sole authority to issue currency. All previous contracts between the government and the FRB are void, therefore the debt owed by the government as a result of Obama's stimulus package ( a multi-trillion dollar welfare cheque to the Bankers) is unlawful and therefore any debt related to that money will not be paid and nor will any any such tender be legal anymore.

Individuals who have taken out personal loans with the banks who loaned them the money should repay those debts to the banks. At the same time the removal of income tax from labour would ensure they have enough money to repay those personal debats to the banks.

Whilst the old dollar can remain the currency of private banking transactions between banks and individuals, the banks would have to pay the government what it owed them in taxes based on the new currency.

Over a period of time the transition of wealth via the banks having to pay their taxes in the new currency would remove most of the old fake dollars printed by the FRB from the private banking system. Every year large chunks of private capital owned by the bankers would have to be transferred back to the people via the National Bank For America being paid its tax revenues owed to the government in its currency, the Liberty Dollars.

2) Issue that new currency The Liberty Dollar based on Gold and at the same time begin the transition to a new Energy Standard to run alongside a banking system based on the Gold Standard. Banking transactions will be based on tangible assets like gold reserves whilst a nations GDP rating and international credit worthiness rating must be pegged both on its wealth (based on tangible assets such as gold reserves ) but also its ability to produce its own internal energy demands.

The Energy Standard must be based on a nations financial stability and its economic integrity relate as much to its 'energy income' as its financial income.

A nation that produces 100 % of its own internal energy demands will be classified as more financially secure as a nation that relies 100 % on energy imports.

A nation that produces 100 % of its own energy requirements from sustainable renewable energy sources and is able to export that energy will have the highest economic rating of all.

The future economics of this planet will be based on the economics of energy supply and demand.

The export of energy supplies from nations is the basis of future economic prosperity.

Therefore the new currency to replace the fake FRB 'dollar' must be replaced by a new currency issued by the National Bank of America.

I suggest it be called ' The Liberty Dollar ' in that the dollar bill is re-designed and a whole new currency issued as cash.

3) Ban all income tax for anyones personal labour. The only taxation should be on corporate profits. If you are a rich business person that owns their own company then you will pay high taxes as you have a high income paid to you via the corporation you run. Corporations should not be able to avoid paying tax.

In one stroke the lives of millions would be transformed for the better.

The working man will have the profits of his own labour in his own pockets instead of in the pockets of the government and the bankers.

This would be the day of The Second American Revolution, its true day of national liberation from the tyranny of bankers, the government and the media.

Add to Technorati Favorites

Tuesday, 21 July 2009

The Spider

In the dark recesses of every human soul,
Hides a hungry hunting spider,
That seeks to rise from deep within,
And gain dominion over the day.
It watches over us when we sleep,
Until the moment is decided,
Then with deadly intent it starts to weave,
The sinister filaments of its tyranny,
A web of lies with our wires, inter-connecting,
Each to the other, under constant surveillance,
In order to entice us into its silken traps,
That we have been taught to call freedom.
Seducing the eye and enslaving the world,
With its beautiful images of killing machines,
For fear is its name, and war its shadow,
As restless it roams in our sweated dreams,
Prostituting itself to fools and traitors,
In search of a mate, to replicate its criminality.
The self destroyer, it yearns for death,
But cannot act without a hostage,
Night black, within its polished ebony shell,
It scuttles in the gloom, seeking entrance,
Down the dark spider holes of perception,
Whose red, wet lips are always whispering,
Sanitising the slaughter, our TV reality,
It crawls in through your eyes,
It crawls in through your ears,
Then makes it way into your brain,
Building for itself, a simple prison there.

Add to Technorati Favorites

The Military-Media Complex Unmasked

Three films that define our world and the Military-Media Complex.

Watch them and wake up !

The Military-Media Complex is divided into four interlocking parts ;

1) The Military Corporations - Haliburton, Blackwater, Boeing, BAE etc. The Banks and bankers that control the massive military finance flows to the corporations from the federal government or the Bank of England. BAE sells its jets to the British government in order to fight a war started by the US and Britain in Iraq.

2) The Lobby Groups, NGO's, Quangos, Think Tanks - Project for a New Century, Bilderbergers, Trilateral Commission, Round Table Groups, Council on Foreign Relations, Officer of Special Plans, AIPAC, Oil Companies, lawyers for corporations. They advise 1 and 3.

3) The politicians - politicians control the courts, police and army. Political parties and campaigns funded by 1 and 2.

4) The media - they sell the wars to the public. Corporate Media is owned by 1 and 2 and used to ensure 3 are elected and to control public opinion.

That is not a democracy.

That is the inner enemy.

Add to Technorati Favorites

Monday, 20 July 2009

EHRC Lies Again !

The Race Relations Gestapo, the EHRC have been caught lieing - again.

The link in the original article takes you to the statistical analysis, and it tears the EHRC a new asshole.

Lying is not the way to defeat the BNP

By James Delingpole Politics Last updated: July 20th, 2009

33 Comments Comment on this article

Do you remember earlier this month when the Government “proved” that there is “no bias in the allocation of social housing to immigrants”? I do, because Radio 4 didn’t stop crowing about it all day.

“So this totally nails once and for all the evil and racist myth that white, indigenous populations are discriminated against by housing officers,” ran the general tenor of Radio 4’s - and for that matter, all the print media’s - reporting of the issue. “Which means that not only are white, working class people even thicker and more wrong than we thought. But also, very probably, that ethnic communities and immigrants are more delightful and vibrant and generally cherishable than we had hitherto imagined.”

One problem with this factoid (which was announced with great fanfare by the Equality & Human Rights Commission (EHRC) in a report on July 7) is that it has no scientific, statistical or evidential basis whatsoever.

We now know this because a leading statistical analyst, Professor Mervyn Stone of University College, London, has done the homework the news outlets which uncritically regurgitated the EHRC’s nonsense should have done at the time.

His conclusion? That “the figures that EHRC has disseminated as if they were evidence for the claim are of zero inferential value.”

They are meaningless because they break one of the cardinal statistical rules of failing to compare like with like:

“In support of its claim, EHRC misrepresents the meaning of two factual assertions:

“1. That in 2007 ‘less than two per cent’ (1.8%) of social housing was occupied by migrants who arrived after 2002.
2. That ‘nine out of ten’ (87.8%) such homes were occupied by people born in the UK.”

“To make any sense at all, a comparison has to be like-with-like, but this contrast is no such thing.”

“In 2007, the social housing stock was four million of which 72,000 (1.8%) were occupied by migrants and 3,500,000 (87.8%) by UK born. To estimate the chance of a new-migrant applicant getting a home, you would have to divide the 72,000 by the total number of migrant applicants entitled to housing. To estimate the comparable chance for the UK-born, you would first have to establish the number allocated between 2002 and 2007, before dividing it by the number of UK-born applicants for the same period.”

“No calculation of that sort was done for the EHRC study. In fact, the extra data that would be needed to do it are nowhere to be found in the EHRC report. If it were done, the correction would almost certainly reduce the gap between the 1.8% and the 87.8%. Could it even be reversed and accepted as evidence against the EHRC claim? That is a possibility because, as the EHRC report concedes, ‘most new migrants have no entitlement to housing’ and because most of the 3,500,000 homes occupied by the UK-born will have been allocated before 2002.”

The weasel phrase which should have alerted us to this skullduggery, says the Professor, is the EHRC’s claim that its researchers “found no evidence to support the perception that new migrants are getting priority over UK born residents”.

“We have found no evidence that….” Yes, now I think it about it, its a lawyerly formulation you hear being used an awful lot by government ministers, quangocrats and liberal-left fellow-travellers on programmes like Today and Any Questions whenever they’re trying to wriggle out of a well-justified criticism.

This puts their critics in an impossible position: how can they ask for evidence that there is no evidence?

Civitas, the think tank which commissioned Professor Stone’s report, has now made a formal complaint to the UK Statistics Authority asking it to appraise the reliability of the statistical methods used by the report and the statistical reasoning that underlies its claims.

As Civitas’s director David Green rightly says: “Government agencies have a duty to use public funds to commission objective research but the EHRC has failed the meet even the minimal standards of statistical rigour that the public is entitled to expect.”

Fat lot of good his complaint will do. A lie is half way round the world before the truth has got its boots on. The Labour regime knows this. God how its politically correct Quangos know this! And they will go on lying and lying with virtual impunity till the happy day they’re booted out office

Add to Technorati Favorites

Sunday, 19 July 2009

The Slow Death of America

Transmutation of America into a tense multicultural bouquet
July 16, 8:27 AM
16 commentsShareThisRSS Email Print By Frosty Wooldridge

An odd thing happened to the United States in the 21st century as it tripped into quicksand over its guilt-ridden past of discrimination toward minorities such as Native Americans, Asians, Blacks and Latinos. What happened?

After all, the fact remains that white settlers trespassed, ravaged, and slaughtered 522 Indian tribes—their languages, cultures and ways of life. Anyone reading Bury My Heart at Wounded Knee or The Sand Creek Massacre cannot help but cry at the brutality committed against the aborigines of North America in the 1800s.

To see the Indian reservations today, one weeps at rampant alcoholism, domestic abuse and utter hopelessness of cultures unable to operate in the white man’s world—but totally cut away from their own traditions. It’s sad beyond belief.

Their situation may be much like present day Palestine and Israel. The Jews of Israel commandeered the Muslims’ lands around Gaza, but unlike the docile American Indians, the Muslims responded with rockets, bombs and modern weaponry. An uneasy tension and outright hatred percolates throughout the region.

Back in the USA, without a doubt, African-Americans still suffer from being ripped out of their countries in Africa while forced into slavery. They lost their languages, cultures and ways of life. Traders shredded family members at will and with malice. The white man tore them from their agrarian lives into the mechanized age.

In the case of impoverished Mexico, Latinos crossed into the USA willingly to work the fields while enduring racism on every level. Of course, they hated the ‘gringo’ equally, feeling that he stole their lands.

But in 1965, thanks to U.S. Senator Teddy Kennedy, the United States commenced changing its ethnic makeup by importing millions upon millions of immigrants from all over the third world. Under the guise of ‘multiculturalism’ and ‘diversity’, the citizens of the United States watch(ed) indolently as their own culture, language and way of life vanished(s) into the hands of a peaceful, methodical and invading armada of humanity. Within the past 20 years, over nine million Middle Eastern Muslims now make the United States their home. They expect to grow to 20 million in a few decades.

Unlike the American Indians that maintained small populations, Latinos, by 2042 will become the new majority within the United States—totally displacing the white man’s culture and language within a 60 year period. As an ethnic group, they do not tolerate blacks or whites, and it will be interesting to see how they abide with Muslims.

America immigrated itself out of its identity and into a multicultural and diversity predicament. As President Teddy Roosevelt said, “The one absolutely certain way of bringing this nation to ruin, or preventing it from continuing as a nation at all, would be to permit it to become a tangle of squabbling nationalities.”

All the while, everything in America changes beyond its own understanding—much like what happened to the American Indians. Upon his final capture, Warrior Chief Geronimo said, “I think we have lost our way of life forever.”

America spirals into the same dilemma on a gargantuan scale. In the past 40 years, the United States revoked its laws, its culture, its language and its Constitution in order to accommodate outcries from minorities, dispossessed and foreign religions.

In the 60s, Lyndon Baines Johnson offered billions to bring the poor into the Great Society. Tax dollars paid for college tuition for minorities. Every child passed to the next grade whether they accomplished the work or not. As a teacher, I saw ‘affirmative action grading’ allow children who wouldn’t do their work—passed to the next grade. Later, ‘affirmative action jobs’ and ‘quotas’ based on color rather than standards became the norm for workers and students.

But today, Black Americans suffer terrific unemployment, illiteracy and broken families. Millions of kids grow up with a single parent. Violence, ghettos, obesity and hopelessness prevail. In California, Latino gangs dominate Los Angeles neighborhoods as schools ‘house’ students before ‘graduating’ them to the streets, unable to read or write. Millions of unwed teens bring babies into the world with no hope of supporting them other than taxpayer welfare. In Detroit, Michigan, according to NBC anchor Brian Williams, high school dropout rates last year hit 76 percent.

Result: a horrific 32.2 million Americans subsist on food stamps! You must work to get your hands around that number! In America? How? Why?

Today, the same U.S. Congress that perpetrated our massive transmutation into a multicultural society, ponders the appointment of Latino Judge Sonia Sotomayor. By her own admission, she represents ‘affirmative action quotas’ into law school and appointments. She most likely will become an ‘affirmative action’ Supreme Court judge. Yet, when minorities scream at anyone making even the slightest racist statement, she said, “I would hope that a wise Latina woman with the richness of her experiences would more often than not reach a better conclusion than a white male that hasn’t lived that life.”

Americans will find themselves in new conditions as this new legal, multicultural experiment manifests in the coming years. However, it does not portend well for anyone no matter what their race. In a speech in Washington DC, former Colorado Governor Lamm said, “If you believe that America is too smug, too self-satisfied, too rich, then let’s destroy America. It is not that hard to do. No nation in history has survived the ravages of time. Arnold Toynbee observed that all great civilizations rise and fall, and that, “An autopsy of history would show that all great nations commit suicide.”

“Here is how they destroyed their countries,” Lamm said. “First, turn America into a bilingual or multi-lingual and bi-cultural country. History shows that no nation can survive the tension, conflict and antagonism of two or more competing languages and cultures. It is a blessing for an individual to be bilingual; however, it is a curse for a society to be bilingual. The historical scholar Seymour Lipset put it this way, “The histories of bilingual and bicultural societies that do not assimilate are histories of turmoil, tension and tragedy. Canada, Belgium, Malaysia, Lebanon, Holland, Great Britain—all face crises of national existence in which minorities press for autonomy, if not independence. Pakistan and Cyprus have divided. Nigeria suppressed an ethnic rebellion. France faces difficulties with Basques, Bretons and Corsicans.”

Finally, with America adding 70 million more immigrants within the next 26 years, I see ramifications that explode beyond our current predicament best summed up by Dr. Otis Graham, “Most Western elites continue urging the wealthy West not to stem the migrant tide, but to absorb our global brothers and sisters until their horrid ordeal has been endured and shared by all--ten billion humans packed onto an ecologically devastated planet.”

Like a chemistry experiment where unknowing students pour a bouquet of chemicals into a beaker, no one knows what kind of an explosion will occur, but they ‘feel’ something regrettable happening.

At this moment, the British, Dutch and French that will become minorities in their own countries by mid century, may be asking themselves why they did the same things as America.

And the American people, unlike the American Indians, did it to themselves. America will never be the same; never get better. Payback, as they say, is a *itch!

We need a "US Sustainable Immigration Policy" of 100,000 annually. Why that number? That's how many egress the country annually. It would allow a zero net gain and stable and sustainable population.

Add to Technorati Favorites
Add to Technorati Favorites

Saturday, 18 July 2009

RIP Henry William Allingham

RIP Henry William Allingham born 6 June 1896 – 18 July 2009.

As a child of Empire he saw his first century turn,
From victory to war, its slow years rasping,
As a rusted sword drawn from its scabbard,
Cruel in its old age, spiteful to youth,
The path of its progressions led to the Somme,
From calvary charges to belt fed machine guns,
And then beyond even that, to Gulags and Lagoai,
And horrors of fire that could kill the earth.
As another century turned, now through cataracts,
Yet always professing his truth, he stood,
For all that is the best of who we are,
Bearing bright wisdom from its snarl of briars,
Honouring the memory of his fallen comrades,
He taught us all, how we should all seek to be.

Add to Technorati Favorites

Tuesday, 14 July 2009

England Weeps

Cloud wreathed England weeps with pain,
As the coffins are carried forth from the plane,
Solemn in their return, so heavy with loss,
Borne by all who are left to carry the cross,
Unbearable they pass as the flags are lowered,
And all heads bow low, like dying flowers,
The hearses move on, no words are spoken,
In the mourning streets of Wootton Basset.

Cruel fate stole them from this fatal earth,
And time will never heal its hollow curse,
As soldiers they left, yet returned as heroes,
Their deeds remaining as undying echoes,
Ordinary men, husbands, sons and brothers,
Who fought to the end, each for the other,
Together they fell, comrades struggling on,
As we remember them and their sacred bond.

Add to Technorati Favorites

The smile wiped off of Piers Morgan's smug face

Racism is the dehumanisation of an individual on the basis solely of their skin colour, racial and ethnic background.

White people can be racist to white people, just as blacks can be racist to blacks.

Watch this video here and watch the racist prick Piers Morgan, with his smug sneer, wiped right off his fat fucking face.

A poor white man comes on stage, all the cosmopolitans, blacks and whites who despise poor white people, all laugh at him.

He is everything these fucking idiot TV babies and cosmopolitans have been raised to despise.

Poor, white, southern, a farmer, dressed in scruffy jeans and hooded top.

He is a hick, a redneck and as such everyone can be racist towards him with impunity.

They laugh, they sneer as everyone knows you can mock poor whites - even the black presenter in his slick suit has a pop - and then he sings.

He has more talent than any of the talentless 'celebrities' that are judging him.

Go Kevin Skinner !

Add to Technorati Favorites

911, BAE and the Blair Connection

For a while the press have been making 'conjecture' ( aka assisting in the cover up ) as to why the Labour government and Tony Blair cancelled the investigation into the Saudi and British 'Al Yamamah' arms deal ;

The government and the media said it was scrapped as it could damage intelligence relations between the UK and Saudi Arabuia.

Now we know the real reason - the inquiry would have revealed that the slush fund used by BAE to bribe corrupt Saudi officials, including members of the Saudi royal family, was used to directly fund the 911 hijackers.

Yes thats right - BAE money was sent to the 911 hijackers by members of the Saudi Royal family in order to fund their flight traning in the US.

911 was an inside job.

It was funded by the Military Industrial Block in the UK, US and Saudi Arabia.

Sections of the US, Israeli, Saudi Arabian and UK governments knew the 911 attacks were on their way and they all allowed it to happen - whilst warning the rich and powerful in New York to stay away from the Twin Towers on the morning of the attack.

They all conspired to allow the attacks to go ahead - and they all have the blood of the innocent thousands who died on their hands.

Declassified Documents On 911 By UK & Saudis

9-11 Cover Is Blown
By Jeffrey Steinberg


In the report that follows, you will discover that some of the most fundamental assumptions that you have been clinging to since Sept. 11, 2001--assumptions that Lyndon LaRouche warned against--have been a total fraud. Much of what you have been told about the events of 9/11 have been a hoax. The truth, which is clearly revealed in newly declassified documents, available through the National Archives, is that two leading presumed U.S. allies--Saudi Arabia and Great Britain--were up to their eyeballs in the attacks on New York City and Washington. The United States was betrayed by leading elements within the Saudi Arabian Royal Family and intelligence services, in league with the British Empire. And top officials of the Bush-Cheney White House, the Justice Department, and the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) were both aware of, and fully complicit in the coverup of the crime of the century.

The Anglo-Saudi alliance behind the 9/11 atrocity is represented, most graphically, by a 25-year-old secret intelligence arrangement, concealed beneath a lucrative arms-for-oil barter deal called ``al-Yamamah.'' There is now sufficient, credible evidence that funds from the offshore al-Yamamah accounts were funneled to at least two of the 9/11 hijackers, to warrant a high-profile Justice Department probe, without delay.

The newly released documents, when cross-gridded with other evidence already in the public domain, confirm the Anglo-Saudi hand behind 9/11, and debunk nearly eight years of conspiracy rubbish, that portrayed the attacks as a scheme by cave-dwellers and ``under the floorboard'' mysterious forces. The writings of a former LaRouche associate, Webster Tarpley, more or less typify the kind of off-course conspiracy mongering that is now thoroughly discredited by the new material and the larger picture assembled by EIR researchers.

Elements of the story have already been reported in EIR, and LaRouche instinctively pointed to the true nature of the operation, in a now-famous radio interview that he gave to the Salt Lake City-based syndicated radio host Dr. Jack Stockwell, as the hijacked planes were crashing into the Twin Towers and the Pentagonon the morning of Sept. 11, 2001.

If the full implications of the new, confirming evidence of the Anglo-Saudi hand in the 9/11 attack are comprehended and acted on, by the appropriate U.S. and other government services, one of the root sources of global asymmetric warfare can be wiped out--with many other side benefits as well.

The New Evidence

Early this year, the National Archives released documents from the files of the 9/11 Commission, which were previously classified. Three of those documents, recently obtained by EIR, provide the ``smoking gun,'' proving the central role of Saudi intelligence, and the critical support role of British intelligence in the preparation, execution, and coverup of 9/11. The most significant of the documents, still partly classified, is a ``Memorandum for the Record,'' summarizing an April 23, 2004 interview with a Southern California-based FBI informant, who rented a room in his home to two of the 9/11 hijackers during 2000. Although the memorandum redacted the informant's name, other public sources have identified the man as Abdussattar Shaikh. His FBI handler has also been publicly named as Steven Butler.

In the interview, Shaikh provided a detailed account of his first encounter with the two 9/11 hijackers, Nawaf al-Hazmi and Khalid al-Mihdhar. In April 2000, Shaikh posted an announcement on the bulletin board at the Islamic Center of San Diego (ICSD), offering to rent rooms in his home to ``devout Muslims.'' At the time he posted the ad, Shaikh was already acting as a paid informant for the FBI. According to his account to 9/11 Commission investigators Quinn John Tamm, Jr. and Dietrich Snell, Shaikh was approached after Friday prayers by al-Hazmi, who said he and al-Mihdhar urgently needed housing. By Shaikh's account, the two men moved into his home on May 10, 2000. Al-Mihdhar left after six weeks, claiming that he was returning to Saudi Arabia to visit his wife and young child. Al-Hazmi lived in the room until Dec. 10, 2000, when he moved out to attend pilot school in Arizona.

At one point in the interview, the 9/11 investigators asked Dr. Shaikh about another Saudi, Omar al-Bayoumi. From the Commission document: ``Dr. Xxxxxx[Shaikh] noted that Omar al-Bayoumi also visited al-Hazmi at his house. Dr. Xxxxxx knew al-Bayoumi as a Saudi national who Dr. Xxxxxx met at the ICSD. Al-Bayoumi stated to Dr. Xxxxxx when he visited, that `I referred them (al-Hazmi and al-Mihdhar) to you.' Dr. Xxxxxx restated that his was not the case and that he met the two in the hallway of the ICSD after the Friday prayer service.''

The report continued: ``Al-Hazmi did not like al-Bayoumi and told Dr. Xxxxxx that al-Bayoumi was `an agent for the Saudis.' Al-Hazmi complained to Dr. Xxxxxx that al-Bayoumi video taped people associated with the ICSD constantly. Dr. Xxxxxx noted that was his experience when he attended events at the ICSD. Dr. Xxxxxx said that al-Bayoumi always had his videotape recorder and sought comment to the open mike on the videotape recorder. Dr. Xxxxxx stated that, `I have heard that al-Bayoumi is an agent (of the Saudis).''

Dr. Shaikh's candid description of Omar al-Bayoumi as a Saudi intelligence agent, in regular contact with one of the 9/11 hijackers, is stunning in its own right. The fact that Dr. Shaikh was an FBI informant, who, according to several U.S. intelligence sources, regularly received payments from the Bureau to keep tabs on the Muslim community in the San Diego area, and hosted two of the hijackers, is equally stunning. But the full extent of the al-Bayoumi dossier, as known to the FBI and other U.S. government agencies, goes well beyond the surface scandal.

Al-Bayoumi was far more than a ``frequent visitor'' to Dr. Shaikh's home, while al-Hazmi was living there. The essential facts are as follows.

On Jan. 15, 2000, al-Hazmi and al-Mihdhar arrived at Los Angeles International Airport on a flight from Kuala Lampur, Malaysia, where they had attended a meeting of number of al-Qaeda members and allies. The two men were met at the airport by al-Bayoumi, who brought them to San Diego, rented them an apartment, co-signed the lease, and even put down $1,500 in deposit and rent. Al-Bayoumi would later arrange for the two men to enroll in flight training school.

Al-Bayoumi's links to three of the 9/11 hijackers (he hosted a third hijacker, Hani Hanjour, at his apartment on a number of occasions in the Spring of 2000, according to FBI and Congressional documents) prompted one Federal government source to tell reporters, ``Some Federal investigators suspect that al-Bayoumi could have been an advance man for the 9/11 hijackers.''

But al-Bayoumi was also, undisputedly, an agent of Saudi intelligence! According to the FBI and CIA dossier on him, and records from both the House-Senate joint intelligence probe and the 9/11 Commission, al-Bayoumi came to the United States in August 1994. He was previously employed by the Saudi Ministry of Defense, and continued to draw a salary of $3,000 a month from the Ministry after he moved to the United States, through 2002. In the U.S., he was formally listed as an employee of Dallah Avco, a Saudi defense company that held lucrative contracts with the Ministry of Defense and Aviation, and was owned by members of the Saudi Royal Family. According to U.S. Federal investigators, al-Bayoumi never actually did any work for Dallah Avco. However, his monthly salary from the firm increased to $3,500 right after al-Hazmi and al-Mihdhar arrived in the U.S.A.

Further adding to al-Bayoumi's considerable personal finances, in June 1998, an anonymous contribution arrived from Saudi Arabia. The $500,000 was a down-payment on a new mosque, to be built in San Diego--with the proviso that Omar al-Bayoumi be appointed as director of maintenance, with an office and a guaranteed salary. Eyewitnesses told the FBI and the 9/11 Commission that al-Bayoumi was rarely seen at the mosque.

Al-Bayoumi was, however, in constant communication with top Saudi government officials in the United States and in Riyadh. According to the records of the joint Congressional investigation and the 9/11 Commission, between January 2000--when al-Hazmi and al-Mihdhar arrived in California--and May 2000, al-Bayoumi made 32 calls to the Saudi Embassy in Washington, D.C., 37 calls to the Saudi Cultural Mission in Washington, and 24 calls to the Saudi Consulate in Los Angeles. His contact at the Consulate was Fahad Thumairy, who held diplomatic credentials, but was one of the most virulently anti-American imams in the area. He would be deported from the United States after 9/11.

In late June or early July 2001, al-Bayoumi and his wife, Manal Ahmed Bagader, suddenly left San Diego, and moved to England, where al-Bayoumi ostensibly entered business school at Aston University. Within days after the 9/11 attacks, he was detained by Scotland Yard and held for one week. However, he was released for lack of evidence, and he immediately left England for Saudi Arabia.

Osama Basnan

Omar al-Bayoumi was not alone in his liaison work between Saudi intelligence and some of the 9/11 hijackers. He worked closely with another Saudi intelligence officer, Osama Basnan, who entered the United States in 1980 on a short-term tourist visa, but remained in the country until October 2002, when he and his wife were deported as illegal aliens.

An FBI report, written shortly after 9/11, warned that evidence gathered on Osama Basnan ``could indicate that he succeeded Omar al-Bayoumi and may be undertaking activities on behalf of the Government of Saudi Arabia.'' An FBI classified report, dated Oct. 3, 2001, noted that Basnan was in contact with members of the bin Laden family, living in the United States. In the days immediately following 9/11, members of the bin Laden family in the United States, along with other top Saudis, were quietly flown home--at a time when no other non-military flights were being allowed.

Basnan was a subject of FBI interest long before Sept. 11. In 1992, according to news accounts, Basnan was investigated by the Bureau for ties to Eritrean Islamic Jihad (EIJ), an organization that was closely linked to al-Qaeda by no later than 1996. On Oct. 17, 1992, Basnan, then living in Washington, D.C., hosted a party at his home for Sheikh Omar Abdul Rahman, the so-called ``blind sheikh'' now in jail for plotting terrorist attacks in New York City. At the time, according to U.S. intelligence sources, the FBI produced a still-classified report, detailing Basnan's work for the Saudi government, despite his ties to Islamic radicals.

Indeed, U.S. intelligence sources report that Basnan was arrested on drug charges in the Los Angeles area, but the charges were dropped, after intensive pressure from the Saudi Embassy.

The Ambassador and the Princess

If Omar al-Bayoumi's ties to the Saudi Ministry of Defense and Aviation are firmly established, his personal ties to the former Saudi Ambassador to the United States, Prince Bandar bin Sultan, and his wife, Princess Haifa, are even less in dispute. In April 1998, Prince Bandar, who is also the son of the Saudi Defense Minister, Prince Sultan, sent a check to Basnan in the amount of $15,000. Bandar claims that the check was an ``act of charity,'' in response to a written appeal by Basnan for help in paying medical bills for his wife. Beginning in November 1999, just weeks before the two 9/11 hijackers arrived at the Los Angeles Airport, Princess Haifa began sending monthly cashiers checks, from her account at Riggs National Bank in Washington, to Basnan's wife, Majida Ibrahim Ahmad Dweikat. The checks continued until May 2002. The royal couple sent a total of $53-72,000 to Basnan and his wife. According to the House-Senate joint investigation, many of the cashier checks from Princess Haifa to Basnan's wife were signed over to the wife of Omar al-Bayoumi. Most of these transactions took place while Basnan and al-Bayoumi were ``handling'' the financial affairs of at least two of the 9/11 hijackers, al-Hazmi and al-Mihdhar. And the pair of Saudi intelligence officers also had some, as yet not-fully-known ties to a third hijacker, Hani Hanjour.

Prince Bandar's BAE Bounty

At the time that Prince Bandar and Princess Haifa were making their ``charitable'' contributions to Basnan and al-Bayoumi, the then-Saudi Ambassador to the United States was on the receiving end of at least $2 billion in kickbacks from Great Britain's premier defense firm, BAE Systems. The BAE scandal exploded into the public view several years ago, when BBC, the London {Guardian}, and other publications revealed that BAE was making tens of billions of dollars in payouts to Saudi Defense Ministry officials, and other members of the Saudi Royal Family, in return for arms contracts worth a fortune.

The BAE-Saudi scandal dated all the way back to 1985, when Prince Bandar personally brokered a deal with then-British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher, to sell an initial $40 billion in BAE military hardware and services to Saudi Arabia, in return for Saudi crude oil. The deal, cynically known as ``al-Yamamah'' (``the Dove'') was far more than a barter arrangement. BAE padded the costs of the fighter jets, training planes, air defense systems and support services by an estimated one-third, to launder payoffs to top Saudis--including Prince Bandar. In return, Saudi Arabia delivered the equivalent of one super-tanker of oil {per day} (on average) to BAE, which had a contract with British Petroleum and Royal Dutch Shell, to immediately sell the oil on the spot market. For the Saudis, it was a lucrative deal. Even aside from the kickbacks that lined the pockets of many a Saudi prince and ministry official, the crude oil cost the Saudis under $5 a barrel. BP and Royal Dutch Shell sold the oil at fantastic markups.

As the result of this unique arrangement, an offshore Anglo-Saudi intelligence slush fund was amassed, amounting to hundreds of billions of dollars, starting in 1985. In a semi-official biography of Prince Bandar, published several years ago, author William Simpson candidly wrote that al-Yamamah was, first and foremost, a geo-strategic partnership between London and Riyadh, which funneled money covertly to the Afghan mujahideen who were battling the Soviet Army in the 1980s; funded Chad in its border war with Libya; and bypassed the U.S. Congress to deliver American military hardware to the Saudi Air Force.

Some senior U.S. intelligence officials insist that a full investigation of Prince Bandar's role in the al-Yamamah scheme would reveal that some of the BAE payoffs went from the Bank of England, to Bandar's account at Riggs National Bank--into the hands of Basnan, al-Bayoumi, and the California 9/11 hijackers cell. By Aug. 2, 2003, so many questions had been raised about the Bandar payoffs to Basnan, that the Ambassador was forced to issue a personal statement, through the Saudi Embassy, branding the allegations ``baseless and not true,'' nothing more than ``rumor, innuendo, and untruths.'' He cited President George W. Bush, who ``praised the Saudi commitment to fighting terrorism.''

Bandar's efforts to cover up the Saudi government hand in 9/11 by invoking the words of President Bush only served to further infuriate those U.S. officials who were actually trying to get to the bottom of the Sept. 11 plot. House and Senate intelligence committee investigators knew, for example, that when their final ``Report of the Joint Inquiry into the Terrorist Attacks of Sept. 11, 2001'' was submitted to the White House for final review before publication, the entire text of a 28-page chapter, documenting evidence of Saudi government support for the hijackers--including the Bandar payments to Basnan--was blocked from publication and remains classified to this day. In a recent meeting with the families of the 9/11 victims, President Barack Obama was pressed to declassify the chapter.

Both Presidents Bush were so close to Prince Bandar that the longtime Saudi Ambassador was widely referred to as an ``honorary member of the Bush family.'' The G.W. Bush White House commitment to brutally suppress the evidence of the Anglo-Saudi hand in 9/11 was so deep that Osama Basnan, the Saudi intelligence officer, felt confident enough to be in Houston, Texas, on April 24-25, 2002, when then-Saudi Crown Prince (now King) Abdullah, along with Prince Bandar, visited President Bush at his Crawford, Texas ranch. The Crown Prince's entourage was massive--eight planeloads of aides and hangers-on. Among the crowd were three Saudi officials suspected of ties to al-Qaeda. The ``embarrassing'' incident was suppressed, along with Basnan's presence in nearby Houston, where he was reportedly meeting with a billionaire Saudi prince who was part of the Crawford entourage.

Four months later, Sen. Bob Graham (D-Fla.), who chaired the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, which conducted the joint Congressional 9/11 probe along with the House Intelligence Committee, declared that, to his knowledge, the CIA had ``incontrovertible evidence that there is support for these terrorists within the Saudi government.'' Hewould later emphasize the point in his book on the joint Congressional probe, Intelligence Matters.

Britain - State Sponsor of Terrorism

In December 2000, the Editors of EI submitted a lengthy memorandum to then-Secretary of State Madeleine Albright, seeking an investigation of British government sponsorship of international terrorism. The memo, prepared with the assistance of State Department attorneys, who provided EIR with the official criteria for placing a nation on the list of ``state sponsors of terrorism,'' relied exclusively on official government documents, from no fewer than nine nations, that had formally protested British government protection, and, in some cases, financing of active terrorist cells on British soil. The EIR memo was triggered by a rash of asymmetric warfare attacks, many by groups spawned out of the 1979-89 Afghanistan War against the Soviets, a war covertly bankrolled and logistically backed by British, French, American, Saudi, and Israeli intelligence services.

The British government's protection was extended to such terror groups as the Kurdish Workers Party (PKK), which had a radio transmitter in Britain that beamed marching orders for terrorist attacks into eastern Turkey; the Egyptian Islamic Jihad, which carried out a brutal 1997 attack on Japanese tourists at Luxor, Egypt, and had earlier assassinated Egyptian President Anwar Sadat; the Indian terrorist group Lashkar e-Taibi, which carried out assassinations and hijackings in 1999; and Chechen terrorists, who were recruited out of mosques in England.

Among the charges against the British government: British intelligence had looked the other way, throughout the 1990s, as Osama bin Laden moved between Pakistan, Afghanistan, Sudan, and England. The London Times admitted that, throughout the second half of 1996, bin Laden made frequent trips to London, ''clearly under the protection of British authorities.'' The Times had spotted bin Laden, earlier in the 1990s, at the London estate of Khalid bin Mahfouz, a wealthy Saudi banker who was a leading Muslim Brotherhood funder of a wide array of Jihadi groups, and was a majorshareholder in the Bank of Credit and Commerce International (BCCI). In 1994, the French and Algerian governments filed diplomatic demarches with the British Foreign Office, charging that Osama bin Laden had met with leaders of the Islamic Group of Algeria (GIA), which was then in the middle of a blind terror bombing campaign in both countries. French intelligence tracked the bin Laden/GIA meetings to a bin Laden-owned estate in Wembley. For three months in 1994, according to other French sources, including investigator Roland Jacquard, Osama bin Laden lived on Harrow Road in London. Even after he left the country, bin Laden's leading propagandists operated out of London.

According to ``conventional wisdom,'' the British protection of a worldwide nexus of terrorist organizations was based on an understanding that the groups would not operate on British soil, or target British interests abroad. But, anyone with even a cursory knowledge of the history of the British Empire, from the early days of the British East India Company, through Lord Palmerston's sponsorship of the Young Europe, Young America, and Young Turk operations of the 19th Century, realizes immediately that this is a fraud. Sponsorship of asymmetric warfare is at the very heart of the British/Venetian method. And the Anglo-Saudi al-Yamamah project is the 20th- and 21st-Century equivalent of the British East India Company's sponsorship of legions of ethnic and religious separatist groups, assuring a ready stable of political assassins and perpetrators of ``chaos on demand'' around the globe.

Will the Bush League Coverup End?

Even as investigators for the joint Congressional inquiry and the 9/11 Commission attempted to get at the role of Saudi intelligence in 9/11, a vicious coverup was being imposed directly from the White House, and with full complicity of elements within the FBI and Department of Justice. It became so blatant, that three 9/11 Commission investigators--Kevin Scheid, Col. Lorry Fenner, and Gordon Lederman--drafted a memo to their staff supervisors, Dan Marcus and Steve Dunne, proposing guidelines for FBI and other ``minders.'' The memo bitterly complained that FBI and other ``minders'' sitting in on interviews with Commission witnesses, interfered in the questioning and intimidated the witnesses:

``Minders have positioned themselves physically and have conducted themselves in a manner that we believe intimidates witnesses from giving full and candid responses to our questions. Minders generally sat next to witnesses at the table and across from Commission staff, conveying to witnesses that minders are participants in interviews and are of equal status to witnesses . Moreover, minders take verbatim notes of witnesses' statements and may engage in retribution. We believe that the next effect of minders' conduct, whether intentionally or not, is to intimidate witnesses and to interfere with witnesses providing full and candid responses.''

The memo concluded with a plea: ``We request that you raise the subject of minders' conduct with the Executive Branch in order to prevent minders from comporting themselves in these ways in the future.''

Attached to the memo were ten proposed rules of conduct, to block the intimidation. Apart from the fact that the memorandum was declassified and released at the National Archive earlier this year, no action was taken and the Bush White House coverup--typified by the suppression of the Congressional report section dealing with Saudi government complicity in 9/11--continued to the end.

Condoleezza Rice Lied

The coverup, in at least one case, may have involved contempt of Congress. When a battle erupted between the 9/11 Commission and the White House over the public disclosure of segments of a Presidential Daily Briefing from August 2001, in which President Bush was explicitly warned about a high-probability al-Qaeda attack against the continental United States, then-Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice testified before Congress that there was no ``actionable intelligence'' provided by the intelligence community, and that no one could have anticipated the events of 9/11.

In stark contrast to Rice's sworn testimony, U.S. intelligence had strong indications that, not only was al-Qaeda planning to hijack planes, but was planning to use them as weapons. According to the third document released this year by the 9/11 Commission, the Federal Aviation Administration and the North American Aerospace Defense Command (NORAD) conducted a series of exercises, as early as October 1998--shortly after the attacks on two U.S. embassies in Africa--involving hijackings. The last of the exercises, ``Vigilant Guardian I,'' took place between Sept. 6-10, 2001. In one of the scenarios, described in a 9/11 Commission summary chronology, a London-to-New York flight is hijacked by ``terrorists with explosives who plan to detonate them over NYC.'' Clearly, the idea that terrorists were planning to use aircraft as a weapon against New York City, was on the minds of some Federal counter-terror officials prior to 9/11.

Basnan's Free Ride Home

On Oct. 21, 2002, a Federal judge in California ordered Osama Yousef Basnan and his wife, Majida Ibrahim Ahmad Dweikat, to be deported from the United States--for immigration violations! The Saudi intelligence officer who had been in the country illegally since the early 1980s, who had bankrolled, along with Omar al-Bayoumi, at least two of the 9/11 hijackers, was so pleased with the judge's order to send him back to Saudi Arabia, that he walked up to the Federal prosecutor at the end of the hearing and shook his hand, thanking him profusely for the free ride home.

The message delivered that day in court could not have been clearer: The Anglo-Saudi terror nexus was off limits. The idea that two of America's most trusted so-called allies--Great Britain and Saudi Arabia--had betrayed the United States, and played an indispensible role in the worst terrorist atrocity in history on American soil, was to be buried.

Add to Technorati Favorites